👆👀👌👉 🎆 Perbedaan Hdd 5400Rpm Dengan 7200Rpm

AntaraSSD dan HDD terdapat beberapa perbedaan yang tidak bisa Anda abaikan, di antaranya yaitu sebagai berikut: 1. Komponen yang Terdapat di Dalamnya. Bagian mekanik HDD terdiri atas piringan, lengan dan motor yang terhubung ke piringan secara langsung, sementara SSD tidak punya ketiga bagian itu, melainkan komponen utama berupa IC, chip dan Answer(1 of 9): With all other specifications for the drives being the same, a 7200RPM drive will be faster than the 5400RPM drive. Note however, that in the grand scheme of things, the difference will be slight and not necessarily noticed with most applications. For any disk I/O, there are 3 co 8AM4 16 (8+4+4) DDR4-2933 dual-channel: 35 W N/A N/A YD320BC6M4MFH Ryzen 3 3200G: July 7, 2019 US $99 3 Acer Aspire A515-43 AMD Ryzen 3 3200U Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx, 2600Mhz The suggested retail prices of the new Ryzen APUs are Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load Rating - 100% Rating - 100%. Typically the more the hard drive RPM, the faster the hard disk. Therefore, 7200 RPM hard drives are usually faster than 5400 RPM hard drives. For a 7200 RPM hard drive, the time required for each revolution is 60 × 1000 ÷ 7200 = 8.33 milliseconds, and the average rotation latency time is 8.33 ÷ 2 = 4.17 milliseconds. Vay Tiền Nhanh Chỉ Cần Cmnd. jjforums Zumbi Registrado Mensagens 328 Curtidas Responder Leigo Expert General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 233 Curtidas 2 Por Leigo Expert 18/08/2010 - 2117 sim,se for 7200 sim se for 5400 não,pois quanto mais rpms o HD tem,mais rápido é sua velocidade de trabalho. jjforums Zumbi Registrado Mensagens 328 Curtidas 3 Por jjforums 18/08/2010 - 2145 isso me preocupou agora, já que os hds samsung são mais de 5400, e o cara colocou um samsung de 1TB no orçamento... Death Spirit Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 67 Curtidas 4 Por Death Spirit 18/08/2010 - 2154 Não tem tanta diferença assim, eu mesmo comprovei recentemente, existe sim uma vantagem no de 7200, mas essa não é mais a mesma vantagem gritante que havia quando os primeiros modelos de 7200rpm chegaram no mercado, esmagando os de 5400, hoje em dia tecnologias mais avançadas nos metodos de busca, leitura, buffer, interface entre tantas outras coisas, tornam praticamente imperceptiveis a olho nú a diferença entre HDs modernos de e JaguarPaw Ubbergeek Registrado Mensagens 517 Curtidas 5 Por JaguarPaw 18/08/2010 - 2158 se o RPM do hd fosse importante, hj facilmente os dicos rígidos iriam girar a tem q se avaliar aí vários fatores, densidade dos pratos, buffer, escrita/leitura... I5 2500k by Hyper 212 _ GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 _ 2x 4Gb Ripjaws-X _ VTX3D R7 260x 2GB _ OCZ Agility 3 120Gb + ST500DM002 _ Seasonic SS-350SFE _ LCD Semp 32" _ Windows 10 Mensagens 725 Curtidas leoaspas Zumbi Registrado Mensagens 379 Curtidas 7 Por leoaspas 21/08/2010 - 1646 Depende do que vc vai utilizar neles, se forem apenas backup, a diferença não é grande. Kraftwerk Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens Curtidas 8 Por Kraftwerk 21/08/2010 - 1700 Olá amigo. Faz diferença nos IDE e nos SCSI, tanto que SCSI tem de e rpm. Já nos SATA não é algo tão grande, mas se for para sistemas e banco de dados a diferença a mais ajuda. Até mais. Christo Nihil Praeponere "Quem procura a Verdade, consciente ou não, procura Deus" "Aprovemos Leis que proíbam o Comunismo, o Fascismo, o Nazismo, o Socialismo e qualquer doutrina totalitária." "Quando dominam os justos, alegra-se o povo; quando governa o ímpio, o povo geme." Provérbios, 292 mambembe Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 108 Curtidas 9 Por mambembe 21/08/2010 - 1742 Se fosse possível estabelecer uma "regra" para desktops, seria mais ou menos o seguinte ou superior - recomendado para o disco com o sistema operacional - mais do que suficiente para um disco de dados/backups O disco com SO está sendo acessado o tempo todo, então é interessante que ele seja mais rápido, mesmo que seja pouca coisa. Já o disco de dados/backups só "acorda" quando solicitado, então é interessante que ele rode numa velocidade menor menor consumo de energia e possivelmente maior vida útil. Claro que não existe "regra" nenhuma, mas o padrão acima é o mais efetivo. - Para um disco externo de backups o recomendado seria o de pois esses discos esquentam menos. Hurso Ubbergeek Registrado Mensagens 445 Curtidas 10 Por Hurso 21/08/2010 - 1816 Só lembrando que existe o fator memória cache quanto maior, melhor. Um abraço !!! FEDORA 37 + Win10CM ELITE 310FX-6300 * Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 * WC PCYES SANGUE FRIO 120mm AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 18GB DDR3 * WD 2TB+0,5TBKingston A400 de 240GB K345600WCX 600LG 32LK450 * Blink 300Mb/s * EXTREAM LASSUS * + Samsung M2070w * PS5 + Dell Inspiron 14 2230 N4050 Vamos GALO !!! aureoh Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens Curtidas 11 Por aureoh 21/08/2010 - 1817 O de 7200 RPM esquenta mais e consome mais disseram acima,hoje em dia nao ha tanta diferença do 7200 pro 5400 em termos de desempenho,logico que o de 7200 vai ser mais rapido em algumas aplicaçoes do tipo acesso aleatorio,se voce for usar apenas para backup pode usar tranquilamente o de 5400RPM. Piu_ssj2 Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 84 Curtidas 12 Por Piu_ssj2 21/08/2010 - 2302 nenhuma diferença. você tem que olhar o tamanho do cache, marca, modelo e capacidade. isso aí, é apenas um item a mais, na minha opinião. Mensagens 73 Curtidas 13 Por BR_SHARK 21/08/2010 - 2334 Vai depender muito do modelo, tenho dois HDs, um Samsung HD502HI e um Samsung HD160HJ, mesmo o de 160GB sendo 7200RPM, ele é mais lento que o de 500GB com 5400RPM, o de 5400RPM faz chega até 1400Mbits de leitura, o de 7200RPM chega a 950Mbits de leitura, tenho o Windows e programas no de 5400RPM e no 7200RPM meus backups. E também os de 5400RPM de grande capacidade dificilmente dá problema. mambembe Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 108 Curtidas 14 Por mambembe 21/08/2010 - 2351 Mas HDs com tamanhos diferentes têm densidades diferentes... Fica difícil comparar. Só para botar lenha na fogueira, o disco rígido para desktops mais rápido do mercado gira a RPM. Mensagens 73 Curtidas 15 Por BR_SHARK 22/08/2010 - 0026 Existem alguns carissimos SCSI de 15K RPM. Mas com o preço de um 15K ou 10K RPM é mais negócio um RAID0 de dois ou RPM. Por isso RPM nunca é sinal de desempenho. Tem que se avaliar ao todo. Responder Tópico ESCARAVELHO Membro Junior Registrado 167 Mensagens 0 Curtidas Responder rEnAtO...rEg... Super Participante Registrado 725 Mensagens 1 Curtida 2 Por rEnAtO...rEg... 16/04/2003 - 1516 Olá amigos! 8 Há muita diferença no desempenho entre HD de 5400RPM e 7200RPM, sabendo q ambos são de 40GB?? qual marca?, tem diferença sim, mas depende da marca, tem uns de 7200RPM que esquentam muitoooo, tipo o meu da assinatura é um desses que esquentamm...rs 8 ... arouca Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 1 Curtida 3 Por arouca 16/04/2003 - 1616 qual marca?, tem diferença sim, mas depende da marca, tem uns de 7200RPM que esquentam muitoooo, tipo o meu da assina... A diferença é notável, principalmente na inicialização do OS e abertura de programas, mas em casos onde o hd esquenta muito não é válido, pois trava o micro! O problema de aquecimento também pode ser resolvido, mas é um mais um gasto! Muitas vezes sua dúvida já foi respondida, é só PESQUISAR em nosso banco de dados. Maldita busca do fórum, atualmente não funciona. fcm Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens 474 Curtidas 4 Por fcm 16/04/2003 - 1731 Olá amigos! 8 Há muita diferença no desempenho entre HD de 5400RPM e 7200RPM, sabendo q ambos são de 40GB?? Uma diferença absurda não tem, mas eu gostei do meu de 7200RPM, e se for trocar, vai ser por outro desta rotação... eu já comparei a transferência de arquivos entre o meu PlusAS e um Seagate 5400RPM de 40GB, e o meu foi bem melhor... ele só é barulhento, mas já acostumei com ele, sendo q não é um barulho tão irritante como uns coolers ae q parecem secador de cabelo... M Dell Vostro 3550 i7-2670QM 16GB DDR3 SSD Crucial 480GB+ WD Black 750GB 7200RPM HTPC Phenom II X4 945 MA785GM-US2H 8GB DDR2-1000 HD7770 Ghz Sandisk Plus 120GB DSA-5060V Oldschool XP-M 2200+3700+ A7N8X-E Deluxe 2GB DDR440 X1650 Pro WD 80GB sampa2004 Membro Junior Registrado 80 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 5 Por sampa2004 16/04/2003 - 1743 Quais marcas de HD 7200 RPM esquentam mais e quais esquentam menos? Complementando esse tópico, existe diferença notável entre um HD ATA 100 e 133 numa placa mãe que suporta até ATA 133? ESCARAVELHO Membro Junior Registrado 167 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 6 Por ESCARAVELHO 16/04/2003 - 1746 É que comprei um HD e não prestei atenção na velocidade daí quero saber se compensa trocar o modelo de 5400RPM por outro de 7200RPM voltando um troco. Os dois HDs são da marca Seagate. fcm Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens 474 Curtidas 7 Por fcm 16/04/2003 - 1751 Quais marcas de HD 7200 RPM esquentam mais e quais esquentam menos? Complementando esse tópico, existe diferenç... Depende da ventilação interna do case... mas os que aparentam esquentar menos são os Seagate...É que comprei um HD e não prestei atenção na velocidade daí quero saber se compensa trocar o modelo de 5400RPM por outro de 7200RPM voltando um troco. Os dois HDs são da marca Seagate.... Compensa sim kra... eu trocaria... M Dell Vostro 3550 i7-2670QM 16GB DDR3 SSD Crucial 480GB+ WD Black 750GB 7200RPM HTPC Phenom II X4 945 MA785GM-US2H 8GB DDR2-1000 HD7770 Ghz Sandisk Plus 120GB DSA-5060V Oldschool XP-M 2200+3700+ A7N8X-E Deluxe 2GB DDR440 X1650 Pro WD 80GB MikeOzzy General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 48 Curtidas 8 Por MikeOzzy 16/04/2003 - 2158 Eu não trocaria, pois para mim em um HD é muito mais importante a confiabilidade do que o desempenho, e ao meu ver os 7200 rpm proporcionalmente possuem índice de falhas prematuras maior. Mas esta é a apenas a minha humilde opinião, ok? diego_uss Geek Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 9 Por diego_uss 16/04/2003 - 2200 Eu não trocaria, pois para mim em um HD é muito mais importante a confiabilidade do que o desempenho, e ao meu ver os... os maxtor sim... mas marcas conhecidas pela sua confiabilidade como a seagate, não acho que tenham esse problema de morte prematura... pelo menos não vi nenhum caso... AXP 512 DDR400Shuttle AK35GT2R Radeon 9600pro 40gb 7200rpm Sattelite case moded MikeOzzy General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 48 Curtidas 10 Por MikeOzzy 16/04/2003 - 2221 os maxtor sim... mas marcas conhecidas pela sua confiabilidade como a seagate, não acho que tenham esse problema d... Para mim não existe marca de HD totalmente confiável. Trabalhei cinco anos como técnico em manutenção hoje estou em outra, graças a Deus e cansei de ver HD Seagate morrendo. Mas sem dúvida nenhuma a campeã de problemas é a Quantum, quase toda semana no lugar onde eu trabalhava aparecia um micro com HD Quantum bichado. É lógico que temos de levar em consideração que a Quantum sempre vendeu muito no mercado brasileiro, e que marcas como a WD sempre tiveram uma baixa participação no nosso mercado. E não é de se estranhar que problemas com os Maxtor tenham aumentado justamente após a mesma comprar a Quantum? Responder Tópico Lokasi halaman Beranda RacikPC Seputar Hardware Test Perbedaan Kecepatan Harddisk 7200rpm & 5400rpm Benarkah Loading Game dan Transfer Data Lebih Cepat? WD Blue vs Seagate Barracuda Benarkah jika Harddisk 7200rpm lebih ngebut dan lebih kencang ketimbang HDD 5400rpm? terutama ketika diajak untuk transfer file maupun loading game? Apakah layak jika kita lebih memilih HDD 7200rpm untuk dibeli dan digunakan pada PC? Untuk menjawab semua pertanyaan tersebut, sengaja sudah admin buatkan artikelnya berikut ini. Silahkan dibaca hingga selesai. Test Perbedaan Kecepatan Harddisk 7200rpm & 5400rpm Benarkah Loading Game dan Transfer Data Lebih Cepat? WD Blue vs Seagate Barracuda Test Perbedaan Kecepatan Harddisk 7200rpm & 5400rpm Benarkah Loading Game dan Transfer Data Lebih Cepat? WD Blue vs Seagate Barracuda Harddisk adalah media penyimpanan data yang sangat populer, bahkan sebagai media penyimpanan pada komputer yang paling lama gunakan. Harddisk sudah banyak mengalami perkembangan. Mulai dari user Interfacenya dari ATA ke SATA hingga kapasitas masih ingat, HDD pertama yang admin miliki berkapasitas 500GB buatan Hitachi yang merupakan Harddisk utama pada Laptop Toshiba M645. Kala itu HDD dengan kapasitas 500GB masih dianggap sebagai HDD berkapasitas besar, namun sekarang sudah banyak sekali HDD inchi yang bisa kamu temui berkapasitas hingga 2 TB. Selain HDD inchi, ada juga HDD setandar dengan ukuran inchi. Pernahkah kamu perhatikan jika pada sticker HDD tersebut terdapat indikator RPM? Misal 5400rpm atau 7200rpm? Apa sebenarnya RPM tersebut dan seberapa pengaruhnya pada sebuah HDD? RPM atau Rotation per Minute adalah banyaknya putaran yang bisa dihasilkan oleh perangkat keras cakram dalam waktu 1 menit. Harddisk atau HDD sendiri menggunakan RPM karena HDD menggunakan prinsip putaran cakram ketika membaca maupun menulis data. Logikanya semakin kencang dan semakin banyak putaran cakram HDD dalam satu menit, maka semakin tinggi juga kemampuan HDD tersebut untuk melakukan Read dan Write ini Screenshot perbandingan dari HDD 7200rmp dengan HDD 5400rpm Kalau kamu lihat memang terdapat perbedaan yang cukup signifikan antara HDD 7200rpm dengan yang 5400rpm. Bahkan bisa dibilang 2 kali lipatnya. Namun begitu, speed HDD 7200rpm tidak bisa menyaingi SSD yang punya kisaran di 500. Tap cukup lumayan ketimbang 5400rpm. Oh iya, HDD 7200rpm tersebut dari Seagate sedangkan yang 5400rpm dari WD Blue. Admin juga dulu sempat bingung mau pilih RPM HDD yang mana, 5400 atau 7200. Mengingat dari segi harga keduanya tidak terpaut jauh. Namun akhirnya admin memutuskan untuk memilih konfigurasi HDD 7200rpm untuk data installan game, sedangkan 5400rpm untuk data biasa. Pemilihan ini tidak lain karena admin ingin mengejar performa game ketika booting dan menjalankan game tersebut. Tapi Apakah Benar Jika HDD Yang Punya Kecepatan Putaran 7200rpm Akan Lebih Cepat Dalam Segala Hal? Terutama Ketika Diajak Untuk Transfer File Dan Juga Loading Game? Agar bisa mengetahui perbedaan dari kedua Harddisk tersebut, maka dari itu admin lakukan pengujian kecil sendiri, terlebih kebetulan admin punya 2 HDD tersebut yang sudah terpasang di PC saat ini. Percobaan pertama yang admin lakukan adalah dengan meng-copy sebuah data berupa file berukuran dari SSD Team Elite 256GB ke HDD WD Blue 5400rpm. Hasil yang admin dapatkan ialah waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk bisa menyelesaikan transfer file tersebut adalah menit, sedangkan untuk HDD 7200rp dari Seagate sendiri adalah dilihat jika terdapat perbedaan 39 detik antara HDD 5400rpm dan HDD 7200rpm. Kalau diperhatikan sih 39 detik memang tidak terlalu berarti, mengingat kita juga sering meninggalkan komputer kita proses transfer file kemudian melihatnya lagi ketika sudah selesai. Akan tetapi yang bisa admin dapatkan di sini adalah konsistensi. Yup, jadi Transfer rate HDD 7200rpm tampak lebih stabil dari pada HDD 5400rpm, dimana HDD 5400rpm terlihat hanya tinggi di awal saja speed transfernya kemudian mulai terjun dan terus. Pengujian terus admin lakukan pada game loading Game Assassin's Creed Origins dari segi booting dan juga loading game, dan hasil yang admin dapatkan tidak ada perbedaan jauh, bahkan dalam pengujian, HDD dari WD Blue dapat waktu booting yang lebih cepat ketimbang HDD 7200rpm dari Segeate. Untuk lebih lengkapnya soal hasil pengujian juga termasuk proses pengujiannya sendiri, bisa kamu tonton videonya di bawah ini Itulah yang admin bisa dapatkan dari pengujian kedua HDD tersebut. Mengingat harga dari kedua HDD baik itu yang 7200rpm dengan 5400rpm berada di rentang harga yang sama yaitu 900 ribu hingga 1 juta rupiah, maka sebenarnya tidak ada salahnya jika kamu memilih Harddisk yang 7200rpm. Sekian artikel admin kali tentang pengujian sederhana dari Harddisk 7200rpm dan 5400rpm. Jika ada yang keliru atau mungkin kamu punya saran silahkan tulis di kolom komentar, dan jangan lupa untuk +1, like dan bagikan. Salam admin 1 Hello, I am upgrading a family member's old laptop and I have a few 5400rpm SSHDs and 7200rpm HDDs lying around. Which would be better for ordinary day to day use? This person doesn't play games and doesn't transfer a lot of large files often. Just internet usage and occasional movies. The options I have are 1 used Seagate SSHD with 5400 rpm speed ST500LM000 and 2 new HGST HDD 7200 rpms HTS725050A7 or new Toshiba HDD 7200 rpm MQ01ACF050 According to userbenchmark, the HDD is effectively faster as sequential read/write is weighted much more heavily. But youtube reviews/tests seem to prefer the SSHD. According to Seagate, their SSHD is better no surprise? Last edited Oct 17, 2018 2 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good 3 SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive, which still has a faster rotation than the Seagate. 4 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Which is better in real world applications for a person who just browses Google Chrome and uses a few programs like media player and microsoft office? We're not dealing with a lot of large files here so these commonly used programs should be on the SSD cache right? 5 Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Drop the 5400 in and call it a day. The only way a 7200 drive gets better is when a 7200 sshd is in place. Drawback of a 7200 drive over a 5400 is power. 6 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. 7 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. Not that bad for a general purpose laptop, only bad for a Gaming unit 8 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 9 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. Here is a comprehensive list. 10 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 11 I would say generally mechanical hdd in laptop fail pretty quickly with heavy use. I have an acer laptop with Toshiba HDD yet that drive fail. HDD are not really tolerant to heat and shock of carrying day to day at least from my experience. Laptop drive bay design and shock reducing features do play a part., despite that from my experience looking at laptop with even good hdd protection features like a Fujitsu, they do start showing smart errors. If they are just used for home use, they would be fine I guess. I would not say HDD is that slow, they are pretty tolerable for normal use though you do feel the speed difference. I would generally recommend ssd nowadays even the very cheap ones with lower capacity they are superior for laptop use. The HDD use for storage instead be it putting in into an external drive case or using a cd drive caddy in a laptop if you have one. Taking out the cd drive and using an adapter to install a hdd into the cd drive slot. 12 OS after few tries will get faster - sure if files it uses frequently are located in SS part of that SSHD. Problems will start when cache gets full after few days. After that time, doing any file transfers or operations outside of it will be slower than on 7200RPM drive. Also, If your mom/sister likes to watch movies few times in a row or go back to fav. ones few times a week, they will be transfered to fast cache at some point - which will be awesome for their performance, don't you think ? 13 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. 14 SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. Backblaze has other test years too with more WD vs HGST and Toshiba harddrives. In the 2015 test for example, 1046x WDC WD30EFRX 3TB drives had a failure rate while 1000x HGST HDS723030 3TB drives had a failure rate. In Q4 2016, the WDC 3TB had a failure rate out of 1105x drives, while the HGST HDS72... 3TB had a failure rate of out of 978x drives. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. After you get past a certain number, the extremely lucky and extremely unlucky drives will no longer skewer the average very much, and some very high drive count models have high failure rates while others do not. Seagate had the most drive in 2016 yet the 2nd highest failure rate at Toshiba had the least number of drives at 237 yet a middle-failure rate of HGST had the 2nd most drives yet the lowest failure rate at .60%, and WDC had a higher failure rate as well. In the 2013-2016 chart here, It seems that WDC's 3TB Red series with 1102 drives had a high failure rate at HGST's 3TB drive 1027 drives, had a failure rate less than half that of What Backblaze statistics seems to tell us that model of the harddrive matters more than brands. Some brands such as Seagate have both really good models with low failure failure out of 1889 drives and really bad models with high failures failure out of 4247 drives. The best model of the series seems to be HGST's HDS5C4040BLE640 with drives that only have a failure rate. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 15 Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. 16 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. 17 Normally I'd stay away from SSHDD and go full SSD but since you want to use what you already have, why not give it a try? Since as you stated, it's for a laptop that will typically see only internet usage and movies, most of what your family member does should be able to fit into the SSD cache portion of that drive. Also, since you have the mechanical drives in hand as well, use one of them to clone the SSHDD and you'll be fine if there's any mechanical failures. Hell, in that instance you could even swap between the drives to see what they prefer which in the end is the most important opinion of them all. Edit Just remember to use the SSHDD in a "normal" manner so it caches what is most accessed by your everyday behavior before truly evaluating its performance. 18 Go ssd or go home If this is not an option, go with the 7200 hdd....especially for the uses you state and since the machine will most likely be plugged in most of the time, the difference in power draw won't matter.... 19 I'd say go with the SSHD. Even at 5400RPM, for normal uses the SSHD will give a better experience than a 7200RPM drive. Plus, if they run the computer off battery the lower power draw of the 5400RPM drive will make the battery last longer. I used one of these 5400RPM SSHDs as a main drive in one of my desktop PCs for the longest time and it worked quite well. Basic tasks like browsing the web, youtube, and Office were much snappier than the 7200RPM hard drive the SSHD replaced. Though, not where near an SSD. Dropping a $30 SSD in a machine as the system drive is one of the best things you can do to wake an older machine up. I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. All the SSHDs were originally 5400RPM, even WD's. They were done as a compromise for laptop users to still give them the battery life of a 5400RPM drive, but boost the performance. It works quite well in practice actually. 20 If your having to buy these drives new, skip both of them and as many have said above, get a full SSD. Messing about with HDs and SSHDs in a laptop isn't worth the hassle and with the cost of a 120Gb or 240Gb or even 480Gb SSD now being as cheap as they are, I'd never consider even thinking about it and just grab one. Doesn't really matter as such on the make of SSD as any will be much better than a standard SSD or SSHD. Windows 10 on a HD is painful, had one in my laptop, got rid of it even though it was 8 times the size of the SSD I have put in its place 2Tb v 250Gb or something near to 21 So 1/3 of the people here are telling me to use the 5400rpm SSHDs, 1/3 here are telling me to use the 7200 rpm HDDs, and the other 1/3 are telling me to buy a SSD even though I already have the HDD/SSHD on hand. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 22 In that case, do a coin toss between 5400RPM and 7200RPM. Winner gets the job 23 Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. Cool story bro, been doing this 20 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. Low cost solution. Bluescreendeath just drop the 5400RPM in and call it a day, it's a general purpose laptop, not specializing in anything, battery life will be more important than super performance. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 24 MQ01ACF050 only has a 16 MB cache which is ridiculously tiny. I wouldn't use that one at all. HTS725050A7 has better sequential performance, lower power consumption, and likely better reliability don't have to worry about MLC wear. ST500LM000 has better random access performance. 25 If you aren't doing too many writes SSHD is the better solution, 7200 rpm drive if you need to write lots of data. Of course I'd suggest a cheap TLC drive, if storage space isn't an issue & price isn't a major concern. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites should upgrade or use an alternative browser. 1 If you were to use a 5400RPM or 7200RPM HDD for your bootup/primary drive with the OS on it, would it make a big difference in start up? I currently run games from a Samsung 5400RPM HDD and they load up pretty quick MUCH quicker than my 360 haha However I don't know how this would be with the OS. Cheers, Primordial genesis Aug 28, 2005 15,926 10 70,865 3 I don't need recommendations, I just need to know the difference between the 2 for the OS and primary drive. I'm currently am using a 500GB 7200RPM Drive and I have no complaints really for the start up, It is what it is, it's not painfully slow but it's not SSD like quick. I'll be leaving this 500GB Drive in here but taking out my 2TB 5400RPM Samsung HDD and that's why I'm asking, I'm thinking of using that as the primary drive. Jan 1, 2014 1,646 2 20,165 5 The higher the RPM, the quicker the drive is able to access and load files. Use the 7200RPM drive as the system drive and use the 5400RPM hard drive for games and all your other stuff files. Similar threads Advertising Cookies Policies Privacy Term & Conditions

perbedaan hdd 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm